Pro-Muslim MP STORMS OUT of PMQs After Rupert Lowe BANS ALL MUSLIMS IN UK!!
It’s quite obvious to me at least that when Robert Low talks about migration illegal legal the amount of people that are coming to this country restore Britain’s deportation policy for example well over 100 pages very well thought out including the law unfortunately it doesn’t mention things like the bill of rights act of settlement British Nationality Act and all things that could really sort the situation out, but nevertheless, it’s there.
And the telling thing to me is the reaction of the establishment where when he talks about this because we’re in a situation we’re in because we have been too soft, too liberal for far too long.
And we’ve ended up losing control of our streets.
we’ve ended up losing control of our security, our spending, our hotels, and just about everything else you care to mention.
And whenever he uncovers inconvenient facts, you’ve got to wonder what the establishment’s playing at with their reaction.
It’s like they don’t want to know.
They want to throw the ball down the road a little way.
and just sweep him to one side and you’ve got massive massive problems in this country as a as a result of this including of course what Robert Low and Restore have uncovered about the gangs which is probably going to get pretty tasty very soon if he does what he says he’s going to do.
Now I want to play you a video and it’s this one here.
Now, this is a session uh following PMQ’s.
Uh you have the main event with uh Starmer.
He buggers off out of the building and they have the session afterwards going over more information.
And this is uh a particular question that Robert Low puts to the minister.
Let’s have a listen.
Uh thank you, Mr.
Speaker, a staggering 10.
1 billion pounds of the 61.
2 billion spent on universal credit in 2024 was gifted gifted to foreign nationals.
Does the minister agree the solution is really quite straightforward.
Ban all foreigners from claiming any benefits.
remove from our country those migrants incapable of financially supporting themselves and hand that money back to taxpaying British men and women who are actually keeping our economy running.
Now, what he’s pointed out there and this geyser that’s just got to his feet on the bottom right there is is very important because the welfare bill, universal credit particularly, is completely out of control.
There are many on universal credit that need that help.
There is a friend of mine that I can think of straight away worked hard all his life no longer able to and needs that help a genuine case there are many others like him you get an element that take the piss out the system and I’m talking about English Scottish Welsh whatever and then you get an element that come into the country by whatever means it happens to be and sponge off the system because it’s easy to access all of this once you’re here.
That’s the very depth of this issue.
And Robert Low is very correct in what he said.
Isn’t it time that we stop them from claiming this? got rid of anybody that can’t support themselves and give the money back to the people.
Now, I’ve heard capitalist politicians say that it’s better to incentivize people through the tax system, give them incentives to look after relatives, have kids, uh educational stuff, all sorts of things.
So if you do something that’s beneficial to society, you get a couple of grand off your tax bill and and then you you find that there’s more going into the system.
But I’m I’m going off there.
But to think about this, when somebody comes into the country, you got to think who are you? Where have you come from? What do you intend to do when you get here? And in this context, can you financially support yourself? And if the answer to that is no, then you’re not coming in.
It’s really very simple.
I call that common sense.
Other people would call me racist.
I don’t care.
Now, let’s see what the response is, shall we? and see what this bloke says.
Minister, thank you, Mr.
Speaker.
Well, not only do I fundamentally disagree with the perspective of the honorable gentleman on You knew that was going to happen and with the red tie and the face, you know, you you know what party he represents.
people who have been here for years, made a contribution, paid their taxes, and then require some help back from a state that they have paid into sometimes for decades.
But not only that, the figure that he uses is a complete conflation, a significant overestimation, and shows his ignorance if he does not understand that it is impossible to suggest that that money has all been paid directly to foreign nationals because the figure that he uses is drawn from the total number of households with a foreign national in and many of the individual claimants could in fact be British or Irish citizens.
Now, there’s a couple of very key things there.
Just as he’s about to bugger off out of the chamber, you you can see him having it on his toes.
Now, he he says at the end of that statement that many of these people could be British or Irish citizens.
Let’s concentrate on British.
There was a there was an argument the other day.
Well, it was the other week actually about Ian Wright, the footballer.
British.
Correct.
But his parentage is Jamaican.
The reason he is British is because of the British Nationality Act 1948 amended 1981.
His parents come to this country, settle, they get British citizenship after having come here from Jamaica.
Ian Wright is born into the family at some time later.
He is then British.
If you took that nationality act out of the equation, and this is a piece of the puzzle they keep missing, that family is no longer British.
They are Jamaican.
and they are living here as our guest effectively.
Many of the people that he says are British probably are according to the British Nationality Act, but in reality they’re not if you take that Nationality Act out of the equation.
So, it’s a poor excuse being used by a left-leaning Fabianist political party who under English law would actually be banned and if the Bill of Rights and the Act of Settlement, the rest of the Constitution of England was adhered to, Labor would never be in power ever again simply because it would be unlawful for them to do so.
And when he talks about foreign uh nationals living here for years claiming citizenship and paying in, that’s not the issue that Robert was raising.
Robert was raising the issue of people coming here and actually sponging off the state and doing sweet FA.
Those are the people that he wants to know about and those are the people he’s concentrating on.
So if anybody’s conflating anything, it’s the guy in the red tie, not Robert.
Very, very valid point.
If you come here, you integrate, you settle down, you obey the law, you work hard, you pay your way, and you get here legally.
I ain’t got a problem here.
I don’t think many many equal-minded people would.
But we we have a massive issue in this country where many are not doing that and it’s continuing to happen by boat, by other means and it’s being made easy for them by a state that just throws millions of pounds at the issue without any thought as to the consequences.
That is what Robert meant, not the reply from the other guy.
And it just shows you how meaningless and how out of touch Parliament really is.
Let me know what you think.
As always, hit the like button, subscribe to the channel, share my stuff.
I’ll talk to you soon.
To the Lou.
